The moon is a fascinating place, and scientists have just uncovered one strange mystery with regards to water on the lunar surface.
As we reported recently, scientists were surprised to find that water was spread out all over the moon rather than concentrated at the poles. And while this discovery has important academic implications, it is also fascinating, and disappointing, for how much it might impact future lunar missions, including the possibility of a moon base.
Ever since we landed on the moon in the 1960s and 70s, man has dreamed of going back there, perhaps this time to set up a permanent colony rather than just visit. And it is seen as an important step in an eventual trip to Mars. But a key part of setting up a colony is having access to resources, and this recent finding by scientists that water may not be in convenient locations could be a devastating blow to those hopes.
Moon water is important not just for drinking water, but also because it could be split into hydrogen and oxygen and used as fuel. If it were in a relatively easy to access place, these resources could prove vital to colonies, but if it is spread out and tough to reach as this latest research suggests, that could create complications.
It’s unclear how this finding may impact future lunar missions. But it will most likely cause scientists to change their approach in planning a future manned mission to the moon.
The full statement from the Southwest Research Institute follows below.
A Southwest Research Institute scientist with expertise in how water reacts with lunar soil contributed to a new study that indicates water and/or hydroxyl may be more prevalent on the Moon’s surface than previously thought.
“Water on the Moon is of intense interest for many reasons,” said SwRI’s Dr. Michael Poston, a coauthor of the paper, “Widespread Distribution of OH/ H2O on the Lunar Surface Inferred from Spectral Data,” published in Nature Geoscience online. Water has been the focus of many lunar missions, largely because it is a critical resource for a Moon habitat. “When you split water molecules, you end up with oxygen and hydrogen, critical components for breathable air and rocket fuel. Hydroxyl (OH) is a more reactive relative to water and not as attractive as water in terms of supporting a lunar station.”
Up until the last decade or so, scientists thought negligible amounts of water were present on the Moon, perhaps existing mainly as ice in the permanently shaded craters near the poles. However, in 2009, NASA’s Moon Minerology Mapper spectrometer onboard India’s Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft and two other NASA flight spectrometers detected signatures interpreted as water in sunlight reflected from the Moon’s surface. These data, along with measurements from NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), also indicated the amount of water on the surface could vary diurnally ? a cycle based on the time of day ? and be more common at higher latitudes. One of these measurements came from the Lyman Alpha Mapping Project (LAMP), built and managed by SwRI.
“This research is a great example of how multiple instruments and investigations allow you to do more than what you could do with one instrument alone,” added the paper’s lead author Dr. Josh Bandfield, of the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado. “As new data about the temperature environment on the Moon emerged, it became apparent that we needed to recalibrate our spectral datasets.”
The Moon produces a mixture of reflected and emitted light. It glows in the infrared when heated by the Sun, and its surface reflects infrared light from the Sun. Using detailed surface temperature maps from the Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment on LRO and thermophysics modeling, Bandfield could subtract the right amount of Moon glow from the reflected sunlight to better characterize the inferred measurements of water.
Poston has conducted extensive experiments with water and lunar samples collected by the Apollo missions that revealed the amount of energy needed to remove water molecules from lunar rock. This helps scientists understand how tightly water is bound to surface materials.
Based on the team’s results, it appears that OH/H2O is present on lunar surfaces under much more wide-ranging conditions than previously understood. The OH/H2O, either in a steady state or actually static, does not appear to be daily migrating about the lunar surface in significant quantities. This limits the amount of OH/H2O that would land in dark polar craters and be trapped there for millennia.
“The next step is to determine whether it’s water, hydroxyl, or a mixture of the two — and where it came from,” Poston said. “Is it from external sources, delivered by comet or asteroid impacts? Is it from internal processes on the Moon itself, such as ancient volcanism? Or could it be an ongoing process of the solar wind reacting with lunar materials to create OH or HH2O?”
“Some of these scientific problems are very, very difficult, and it’s only by drawing on multiple resources from different missions that we are able to hone in on an answer,” said LRO project scientist John Keller of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.
This research was funded by NASA’s LRO program and a Lunar Data Analysis Program grant. LRO is managed by NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, for the Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C.
